Roberts v. Williamson

111 S.W.3d 113 (2003)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
R
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Roberts v. Williamson

Texas Supreme Court
111 S.W.3d 113 (2003)

Facts

Shortly after Courtnie Williamson (Courtnie) was born, she began suffering medical complications. Due to medical malpractice, Courtnie became permanently disabled and developmentally delayed. Her parents, Lainie and Casey Williamson (plaintiffs) sued Dr. Karen Roberts (defendant), other doctors, and the hospital. The Williamsons settled with the hospital and one doctor; the Williamsons’ claims against Dr. Roberts and another doctor proceeded to trial. The Williamsons prevailed at trial, and Dr. Roberts appealed. The appellate court made several rulings, including that the Williamson parents had a filial loss-of-consortium claim for their lost relationship with their daughter, Courtnie. Dr. Roberts appealed to the state supreme court to determine if the parents’ relationship with their child could be the basis for a filial loss-of-consortium claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Phillips, C.J.)

Dissent (Jefferson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 783,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms