Robertson v. Alling
Arizona Supreme Court
351 P.3d 352 (2015)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Robertson Group (plaintiff) sued the Alling Group (defendant). Alling, with the help of its attorney, Mark Sifferman, made a settlement offer to Robertson. Alling then left it to Sifferman to finalize the details. Robertson asked Sifferman to extend the January 31 deadline to accept the offer, but Sifferman did not, and the offer expired. On February 4, Alling emailed Sifferman stating that it was no longer in favor of the terms of the previous settlement offer. Sifferman never saw the email, and on February 6, extended Robertson’s deadline to accept the original settlement offer. On February 8, Robertson accepted the settlement offer. After Sifferman learned that he did not have the actual authority to revive the first settlement offer, he made another settlement offer with different terms. Robertson filed a motion to enforce the February 8 settlement. The trial court granted the motion. The court of appeals reversed. Robertson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timmer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.