Robinson v. Harkins & Co.
Supreme Court of Texas
711 S.W.2d 619 (Tex. 1986)
Jerry Robinson (Jerry) worked at Harkins & Co. (Harkins) (defendant) and was provided a company truck. While driving the truck with his wife, Margaret, he got into an accident rendering Margaret paraplegic. Jerry was not seriously injured in the accident. Margaret (plaintiff) brought suit against Harkins on the theory of respondeat superior. After the accident, Jerry disappeared and was not available at trial. In an attempt to prove that Jerry was driving the truck at the time of the accident, Margaret sought to introduce into evidence an injury report Jerry filed with the Industrial Accident Board (IAB) and statements made by Jerry to Margaret, both of which tended to show that Jerry was driving the truck. The trial court excluded this evidence as hearsay. The court of appeals affirmed. Margaret appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.