Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

519 U.S. 337, 117 S. Ct. 843, 136 L. Ed. 2d 808 (1997)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

United States Supreme Court
519 U.S. 337, 117 S. Ct. 843, 136 L. Ed. 2d 808 (1997)

Facts

After Shell Oil Company (Shell) (defendant) fired Charles Robinson, Sr. (plaintiff), Robinson filed a charge against Shell with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The charge alleged that Robinson’s termination resulted from racial discrimination, violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). While the charge was pending, Robinson applied for a job with another company. When contacted by that company, Shell gave Robinson a negative reference. Believing the negative reference was in retaliation for his filing the discrimination charge, Robinson sued Shell for retaliatory discrimination under Title VII § 704(a). Shell moved to dismiss the claim, arguing that § 704(a) protected only current employees from retaliatory discrimination, not former employees, and Robinson’s claim was therefore not viable. The district court agreed, dismissing the action. The Fourth Circuit en banc affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine the scope of § 704(a)’s protection.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership