Rogers v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Maine
804 A.2d 379 (2002)
- Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Facts
Glenn Jackson (Jackson) (defendant) executed a promissory note, which stated that he promised to pay Paul and Pamela Rogers (the Rogers) (plaintiffs) $3000 plus interest, over the course of two years. Jackson defaulted and the Rogers sued him for breach of contract. Jackson answered by alleging that the promissory note was only one part of a larger agreement and, according to that agreement, he was not required to make payments unless he was able. The Rogers filed a motion for summary judgment, which the lower court granted. Jackson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Calkins, J.)
Dissent (Saufley, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.