Rose v. Chaikin
Court of Appeals of New Jersey
453 A.2d 1378 (1982)
Rose (plaintiff) owned a parcel of oceanfront land neighboring Chaikin (defendant). Chaikin erected a windmill for the purpose of generating electricity. Rose claimed that noise from the windmill was causing sleep deprivation and stress related health symptoms. Rose initially petitioned the city council for a restraining order prohibiting Chaikin from continuing to operate the windmill. The city council issued a temporary restraining order limiting the times when Chaikin could operate the windmill. Alleging ongoing problems from the noise of the windmill, Rose filed suit seeking a court-ordered injunction. Chaikin counterclaimed for an injunction prohibiting Rose from operating a heat pump.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.