Rose v. Giamatti
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
721 F. Supp. 906 (S.D. Ohio 1989)
Peter Edward Rose (plaintiff) is employed as a Field Manager for the Cincinnati Reds (Reds) (defendant) baseball team. Allegations arose that Rose was wagering on Major League Baseball (MLB) games, in contravention of the rules of MLB (defendant). Commissioner of Baseball A. Bartlett Giamatti (defendant) scheduled a disciplinary hearing concerning these allegations for June 26, 1989. On June 19, Rose filed an action in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, against Giamatti, MLB, and the Reds. Rose sought a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction preventing Giamatti from holding the disciplinary hearing. On July 3, Giamatti filed a notice of removal to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. On July 5, Rose moved to remand the case back to the court of common pleas. Rose argued that, because Rose, MLB, and the Reds were citizens of Ohio, there was a lack of diversity among the parties.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Holschuh, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.