Rose v. Locke
United States Supreme Court
423 U.S. 48 (1975)
Harold Locke (plaintiff) broke into a neighbor’s apartment late one night brandishing a butcher knife and forced her to submit to multiple acts of oral sex. Locke was convicted under Tennessee’s sodomy statute and sentenced to serve not less than five but no more than seven years in prison. Locke appealed. Tennessee’s Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction. Locke then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal district court against Jimmy Rose (defendant), the warden of the prison where Locke was incarcerated. The district court dismissed Locke’s petition. Locke appealed. The court of appeals reversed and issued the writ. Rose appealed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.