From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Rossetti v. Busch Entertainment Corp.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
87 F. Supp. 2d 415 (2000)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Rossetti (plaintiff) was injured on an amusement park ride at a park owned by Busch Entertainment Corporation (Busch) (defendant). The park had an admission fee, which Rossetti paid before incurring her injury. Rossetti brought a products-liability suit based on strict liability against Busch. In a separate suit, Rossetti also sued Waterworld, the manufacturer of the ride. Busch argued that it was not in the business of selling products and thus could not be held liable under a theory of strict liability. Busch moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robreno, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
