Royco, Inc. v. Cottengim
Florida District Court of Appeal
427 So. 2d 759, 35 U.C.C. Rep. 465 (1983)

- Written by Douglas Halasz, JD
Facts
The Cottengims (defendant) entered into a contract to purchase a mobile home from Royco, Inc., d/b/a Uncle Roy’s Mobile Homes Sales (Royco) (plaintiff). Royco showed the Cottengims a model mobile home, which depicted a beamed living-room ceiling and ceramic tile in the bathrooms. Moreover, Royco’s salesman knew that the mobile home needed a wide entry door to accommodate Mr. Cottengim’s wheelchair. Nevertheless, Royco delivered a mobile home to the Cottengims that did not have a beamed living room ceiling, ceramic tile in the bathrooms, nor a wide entry door. The Cottengims gave Royco an opportunity to fix the defects, and Royco refused to do so. The trial court ruled that the Cottengims did not accept the mobile home, that Royco materially breached the contract, and that the Cottengims could cancel the contract under Florida’s statute codifying Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-711 even though the Cottengims had an adequate remedy at law in the form of damages. Accordingly, the trial court allowed the Cottengims to rescind the contract and recover the money that they paid to Royco for the mobile home. Royco appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sharp, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.