Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran
United States Supreme Court
538 U.S. -- , 138 S. Ct. 816 (2018)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Jenny Rubin and others (plaintiffs) obtained a judgment against the Islamic Republic of Iran (defendant) under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) exception for claims arising out of terrorist acts against foreign states designated as state sponsors of terrorism. To satisfy the judgment, the claimants sought to attach a collection of antiquities owned by Iran but kept at the University of Chicago. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit found the property immune to attachment. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the issue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.