Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

64 F.3d 1250 (1994)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
R
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
64 F.3d 1250 (1994)

  • Written by Lauren Groth, JD

Facts

Several Indian tribes (plaintiffs) requested the State of California (defendant) to negotiate the placement of stand-alone electronic gaming devices in casinos on the reservation. California refused to negotiate with the tribes because the games were illegal under California law. The tribes sued in district court, seeking declaratory judgment that California was obligated to negotiate the terms of gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment to the tribes, ruling that installation of the games was a proper subject of negotiation under the IGRA. The ninth circuit reversed, holding that California had no duty to negotiate with the tribes over gaming that was illegal under California law. The tribes petitioned for a rehearing. The ninth circuit denied the petition.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

Dissent (Canby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Gaming Law
Indian Law

Key Terms