Russell v. Salve Regina College

649 F. Supp. 391 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Russell v. Salve Regina College

United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
649 F. Supp. 391 (1986)

Facts

Sharon Russell (plaintiff) was a nursing student at Salve Regina College (Salve). Russell was unable to control an extreme, chronic weight problem, which caused friction with Salve faculty. For example, the faculty had difficulty finding uniforms for her, used her to demonstrate how to care for obese patients, and lectured her about losing weight. Russell claimed the faculty’s conduct was tormenting and humiliating, but the faculty claimed it was expressing concern and stating school policy. Tensions rose during her third year because Russell did not meet the requirements of her weight-loss contract, and Salve expelled Russell. Russell then sued Salve for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Russell testified that because of Salve’s conduct she suffered nightmares, nausea, vomiting, gastric upset, and hypoglycemic attacks. Russell did not argue that Salve wanted her to suffer, or even that it knew that her suffering was substantially certain. Rather, Russell argued that Salve’s recklessness was subsumed by its intentionality. Salve filed a motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership