Russell v. Salve Regina College
United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
649 F. Supp. 391 (1986)
- Written by Ross Sewell, JD
Facts
Sharon Russell (plaintiff) was a nursing student at Salve Regina College (Salve). Russell was unable to control an extreme, chronic weight problem, which caused friction with Salve faculty. For example, the faculty had difficulty finding uniforms for her, used her to demonstrate how to care for obese patients, and lectured her about losing weight. Russell claimed the faculty’s conduct was tormenting and humiliating, but the faculty claimed it was expressing concern and stating school policy. Tensions rose during her third year because Russell did not meet the requirements of her weight-loss contract, and Salve expelled Russell. Russell then sued Salve for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Russell testified that because of Salve’s conduct she suffered nightmares, nausea, vomiting, gastric upset, and hypoglycemic attacks. Russell did not argue that Salve wanted her to suffer, or even that it knew that her suffering was substantially certain. Rather, Russell argued that Salve’s recklessness was subsumed by its intentionality. Salve filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
