Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
United States Supreme Court
497 U.S. 62, 110 S.Ct. 2729, 111 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Governor of Illinois issued an executive order instituting a hiring freeze for state agencies, but allowing the agencies to petition the Governor to break the freeze. The Governor used these petitions to make sure state agencies only hired supporters of the Republican Party. Cynthia Rutan, et al. (plaintiffs) brought suit against the Governor and the Republican Party of Illinois (defendants). The plaintiffs claimed that they had either continually been denied promotions within state agencies, or had been denied employment at a state agency altogether, merely because they did not support the Republican Party. The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.