Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois Inc.
California Supreme Court
16 Cal.4th 953, 941 P.2d 1203, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16 (1997)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The jury in a consolidated action for asbestos-related personal injuries was given a burden-shifting instruction during the liability phase of the trial. The instruction shifted the burden of proof from Rutherford, the injured worker, (plaintiff) to Owens-Illinois Inc. (Owens) (defendant) to prove that Owens’s asbestos products were not a legal cause of Rutherford’s asbestos-related injuries, if Rutherford first established that Owens manufactured or sold defective asbestos-containing products to which Rutherford was exposed, and that Rutherford’s exposure to asbestos fibers generally was a legal cause of Rutherford’s injury. Owens appealed, and the court of appeal found that the trial court erred in giving the burden-shifting instruction and that the judgment should be reversed. Rutherford appealed and argued that the trial court did not err in giving the burden-shifting instruction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
