Rutland v. Mullen
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
798 A.2d 1104 (2002)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
At one time, the owner of a large parcel of land acquired an implied right-of-way over a road that traversed a smaller adjacent parcel. John and Brenda Mullen (defendants) bought the smaller parcel in 1971 and immediately converted the old road into a parking lot. In 1997, James Rutland (plaintiff) bought the larger parcel. Rutland wanted to use the road for access to the residential subdivision he planned to develop on his parcel. However, by then the road had almost disappeared, and it was no longer suitable for motor-vehicle traffic. Rutland sued the Mullens for interfering with his business plans. The Mullens’ defense was that the right-of-way had terminated by abandonment. The trial court ruled for Rutland. The Mullens appealed to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Saufley, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.