Rutland v. Mullen

798 A.2d 1104 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rutland v. Mullen

Maine Supreme Judicial Court
798 A.2d 1104 (2002)

RW

Facts

At one time, the owner of a large parcel of land acquired an implied right-of-way over a road that traversed a smaller adjacent parcel. John and Brenda Mullen (defendants) bought the smaller parcel in 1971 and immediately converted the old road into a parking lot. In 1997, James Rutland (plaintiff) bought the larger parcel. Rutland wanted to use the road for access to the residential subdivision he planned to develop on his parcel. However, by then the road had almost disappeared, and it was no longer suitable for motor-vehicle traffic. Rutland sued the Mullens for interfering with his business plans. The Mullens’ defense was that the right-of-way had terminated by abandonment. The trial court ruled for Rutland. The Mullens appealed to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Saufley, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership