From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
S & A Painting Co. v. O.W.B. Corp.
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
103 F.R.D. 407 (1984)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
S & A Painting Co. (S & A) (plaintiff) brought suit against O.W.B. Corp. and Transamerica Insurance Co. (defendants) for breach of contract. At the deposition of Nick Frangopoulos, president of S & A, Frangopoulos referred to portions of handwritten notes to refresh his memory. He prepared the notes at the request of his counsel. The defendants filed a motion to compel production of all of Frangopoulos’s notes, even those not referred to in the deposition, pursuant to Rule 612 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. S & A contends that the attorney-client privilege protects the notes from disclosure.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ziegler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
