Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter

132 S. Ct. 2181 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter

United States Supreme Court
132 S. Ct. 2181 (2012)

Facts

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA) instructs the Secretary of the Interior (the secretary) (defendant) to enter contracts with Indian tribes in order for the federal government (defendant) to cover all the costs of services, such as education, that would otherwise be provided by the government. The ISDA notes that the contracts are made subject to the availability of appropriations. The Ramah Navajo Indians and other Indian tribes (the tribes) (plaintiffs) entered ISDA contracts with the government. During the relevant years that the contracts were in effect, Congress appropriated funds sufficient to cover the contract support costs incurred by any individual tribal contractor but not enough to cover the support costs for all tribal contractors in the aggregate. Therefore, the secretary paid each contractor only a portion of the contract support costs. The tribes sued for breach of contract in federal district court, claiming the government had failed to pay their support costs in full, as was required by the ISDA. The district court granted summary judgment for the secretary. The Tenth Circuit reversed, holding that, because Congress had allocated enough funds to pay all support costs for any individual tribal contractor, thus making those funds legally available, the secretary and government were bound by the contractual commitment to pay all support costs for all tribal contractors. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)

Dissent (Roberts, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership