Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sallen v. Corinthians Licenciamentos LTDA

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
273 F.3d 14 (2001)


Facts

In 1998, Jay Sallen (plaintiff) registered corinthians.com with a domain-name registry called Network Solutions, Inc. The registration agreement incorporated the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), which provided alternative dispute resolution procedures for Internet domain-name disputes. The UDRP provided that international institutions like the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) settle disputes over cybersquatting, using the UDRP’s rules and procedures. Corinthians Licenciamentos LTDA (Corinthians) (defendant) owned a Brazilian trademark for a popular soccer team. Corinthians filed a complaint with the WIPO, accusing Sallen of cybersquatting with respect to corinthians.com. The arbitration concluded in favor of Corinthians. Sallen had to transfer corinthians.com to Corinthians. Sallen then brought a declaratory judgment action in district court, seeking to regain control of corinthians.com. The district court held that it had no jurisdiction over Sallen’s claim. The district court determined that the dispute was governed by the UDRP and that Sallen could not proceed under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). The court reasoned that because Corinthians had no intention of suing Sallen under the ACPA, there was no issue of law to support federal-question jurisdiction. Sallen appealed, arguing that the ACPA provides a cause of action for domain-name registrants who want to challenge the results of UDRP arbitration.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.