Sanchez v. East Contra Costa Irrigation Co.

205 Cal. 515, 271 P. 1060 (1928)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sanchez v. East Contra Costa Irrigation Co.

California Supreme Court
205 Cal. 515, 271 P. 1060 (1928)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

East Contra Costa Irrigation Co. (ECCI) (defendant) owned irrigation canals and ditches. ECCI constructed a siphon so that a canal could cross a creek. The siphon carried water under the creek from the canal on one side of the creek to the canal on the other side. The opening of the siphon at the end of the canal was four feet wide and unguarded. No sign warned of the siphon’s presence. Arturo Sanchez (plaintiff) and his family lived in one of the houses ECCI had constructed for employees a short distance from the canal. The road leading to the houses ran along the canal. There was a low concrete bulkhead between the road and the canal. Sanchez’s five-year-old son was playing with other children at the edge of the main canal, which was filled with three feet of water. The water in the canal was muddy, obscuring the opening of the siphon. While trying to wet a handkerchief, the child fell into the canal, slipped into the siphon at the bottom of the water, and drowned. Sanchez obtained a judgment against ECCI for his child’s death. ECCI appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Langdon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership