Sarco v. 5 Star Financial, LLC
United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
2022 WL 883936 (2022)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Joshua Sarco (plaintiff) worked as a customer-service representative for 5 Star Financial, LLC (Star) (defendant), a life-insurance company serving military families. Sarco’s responsibilities included verifying benefit applications and answering customers’ questions by phone. Sarco’s first performance review was positive. However, his performance declined. In 2017 and 2018, Sarco’s supervisors, Tad Shuey and Amy Wenger, met with Sarco multiple times to discuss complaints. He was making mistakes, failing to timely complete verifications, and not returning customers’ calls. He was also watching YouTube videos during work. Despite the conversations with Shuey and Wenger, Sarco’s performance remained poor, and he was terminated. Sarco, who was openly homosexual and had self-proclaimed effeminate mannerisms and a high-pitched voice, sued Star for gender-nonconformity discrimination and sexual-orientation discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). He claimed that Shuey’s and Wenger’s Christian beliefs motivated them to denigrate him. In support of his gender-nonconformity claim, Sarco alleged that Shuey and Wenger singled him out by banning colorful bandanas that only he wore and that when a coworker told Shuey and Wenger about a customer mistaking Sarco’s voice for a woman’s voice, others overheard and laughed. In support of the sexual-orientation claim, Sarco pointed to Shuey’s and Wenger’s refusal to interview Sarco’s boyfriend for an open role and an alleged statement by Shuey that Sarco did not care about soldiers and airmen, which Sarco believed was based on Shuey’s negative assumptions about homosexual persons. Sarco also claimed policies were applied differently to him. For example, he was required to keep his window closed and double-check his work. Star moved for summary judgment, arguing that the facts were insufficient to support Sarco’s claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Urbanski, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


