Sarco v. 5 Star Financial, LLC

2022 WL 883936 (2022)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sarco v. 5 Star Financial, LLC

United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
2022 WL 883936 (2022)

Facts

Joshua Sarco (plaintiff) worked as a customer-service representative for 5 Star Financial, LLC (Star) (defendant), a life-insurance company serving military families. Sarco’s responsibilities included verifying benefit applications and answering customers’ questions by phone. Sarco’s first performance review was positive. However, his performance declined. In 2017 and 2018, Sarco’s supervisors, Tad Shuey and Amy Wenger, met with Sarco multiple times to discuss complaints. He was making mistakes, failing to timely complete verifications, and not returning customers’ calls. He was also watching YouTube videos during work. Despite the conversations with Shuey and Wenger, Sarco’s performance remained poor, and he was terminated. Sarco, who was openly homosexual and had self-proclaimed effeminate mannerisms and a high-pitched voice, sued Star for gender-nonconformity discrimination and sexual-orientation discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). He claimed that Shuey’s and Wenger’s Christian beliefs motivated them to denigrate him. In support of his gender-nonconformity claim, Sarco alleged that Shuey and Wenger singled him out by banning colorful bandanas that only he wore and that when a coworker told Shuey and Wenger about a customer mistaking Sarco’s voice for a woman’s voice, others overheard and laughed. In support of the sexual-orientation claim, Sarco pointed to Shuey’s and Wenger’s refusal to interview Sarco’s boyfriend for an open role and an alleged statement by Shuey that Sarco did not care about soldiers and airmen, which Sarco believed was based on Shuey’s negative assumptions about homosexual persons. Sarco also claimed policies were applied differently to him. For example, he was required to keep his window closed and double-check his work. Star moved for summary judgment, arguing that the facts were insufficient to support Sarco’s claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Urbanski, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership