Scavenger, Inc. v. GT Interactive Software, Inc.
Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
708 N.Y.S.2d 405 (2000)
Scavenger, Inc. (plaintiff), a developer of computer games, entered into a sales contract with GT Interactive Software, Inc. (GT) (defendant), a game distributor. The contract provided for the sale of four games, each with a separate production and payment schedule. Scavenger duly provided the first two games but failed to deliver the last two. When GT made no payments, Scavenger sued and moved for partial summary judgment on the payment issue. The trial court granted summary judgment to Scavenger. GT appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum Decision)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 159,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.