Schneider v. Finmann
New York Court of Appeals
933 N.E.2d 718 (2010)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Victor Finmann (defendant) represented Saul Schneider. Schneider purchased a life-insurance policy and transferred the interest in the policy among various entities that he owned and then back to himself. After Schneider died, Schneider’s personal representative (plaintiff) sued Finmann for legal malpractice, claiming that Finmann was negligent in his legal advice with respect to the policy because the transfers resulted in increased estate taxes. The New York Supreme Court granted Finmann’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirmed. Schneider’s personal representative appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.