Schneider v. Lazard Frères & Co.

552 N.Y.S.2d 571 (1990)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schneider v. Lazard Frères & Co.

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
552 N.Y.S.2d 571 (1990)

RW

Facts

The board of directors of RJR Nabisco, Inc. (RJR) appointed a special committee to conduct RJR’s sale by auction. The committee hired Lazard Frères & Company and another firm (bankers) (defendants) as its financial advisors. Based on the bankers’ advice, the committee conducted the auction in such a way that RJR’s board eventually rejected a bid from an in-house management group and voted to sell RJR to Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Company (Kohlberg). Laz Schneider and other dissident RJR shareholders (plaintiffs) believed that the management group’s bid was more financially favorable to the group’s interests. The shareholders filed court challenges in two states: (1) a Delaware lawsuit against RJR’s board, RJR’s special committee, and Kohlberg, seeking to block the Kohlberg merger; and (2) a New York case against the bankers for negligence. The bankers moved to dismiss the New York case, arguing that their only fiduciary duty was to the special committee and not to the shareholders.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chandler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership