Schneiker v. Gordon

732 P.2d 603 (1987)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schneiker v. Gordon

Colorado Supreme Court
732 P.2d 603 (1987)

SC

Facts

In July 1979, Jakob Schneiker (defendant) leased property to operate a car wash. In April 1980, Schneiker sublet the property to Darrell Gordon (plaintiff) to use as a car wash. The sublease was for the same term as Schneiker’s primary lease, each running through May 1983. In August 1981, Gordon stopped paying Schneiker rent and abandoned the property. Schneiker endeavored to repossess the property under a provision in the sublease, but Gordon had left the premises in a state of disrepair. Accordingly, rather than trying to relet the property, in February 1982, Schneiker reached a settlement with his lessor, surrendering the primary lease. Gordon sued Schneiker for misrepresentation, alleging that Schneiker misrepresented the profitability of operating a car wash on the property. Schneiker countersued for breach of the sublease. The trial court found in favor of Schneiker, ordering Gordon to pay rent up to the date of Schneiker’s surrender of the primary lease. The appellate court affirmed. The Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lohr, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 747,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership