SEC v. Fehn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
97 F.3d 1276 (1996), 522 U.S. 813 (1997)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
H. Thomas Fehn (defendant) was an attorney who was hired by CTI Technical, Inc. (CTI) concerning a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) investigation. In his representation of CTI, Fehn advised the company that it had not filed several key documents required by the SEC, including a Form 10-Q. CTI stated that it wished to save money on legal expenses, and thus, Fehn provided a blank Form 10-Q, which he would usually complete, for CTI to complete on its own. After CTI completed the form, Fehn edited it and submitted it to the SEC. The SEC later alleged that essential information was missing from the Form 10-Q, and brought suit against Fehn for aiding and abetting CTI in its misrepresentation to investors, in violation of § 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The district court ruled in favor of the SEC. Fehn then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hawkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.