From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Seegers v. Sprague
Wisconsin Supreme Court
70 Wis. 2d 997 (1975)
Sprague (defendant) hired Keller as a general contractor to perform work on Sprague’s home. Keller brought in Seegers (plaintiff) as a subcontractor to perform work on the septic system. During the project, Sprague saw Seegers working on the property and discussed details about the work with Seegers. Sprague paid Keller for the work, but Keller disappeared without paying Seegers for the subcontracted work. Sprague sued Keller in an attempt to recover for defective work, but that action was stayed due to Keller’s absence. Seegers sued Sprague, seeking payment for his work under a theory of quantum meruit. The trial court ruled that Sprague was aware of Seegers’s work and was required to pay restitution to Seegers for that work. Sprague appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hanley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.