From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Segal v. ASICS America Corp.
California Supreme Court
12 Cal. 5th 651, 288 Cal. Rptr. 3d 742, 502 P.3d 389 (2022)
- Written by Kate Douglas, JD
Facts
Mickey Segal and Size It, LLC (plaintiffs) sued ASICS America Corporation (ASICS) and others (collectively, ASICS) (defendants) for fraud. After the jury found in ASICS’s favor, ASICS filed a memorandum of costs. Segal and Size It moved to tax costs, meaning that they asked the court to deny, or at least reduce, some of ASICS’s claimed costs. Specifically, Segal and Size It challenged ASICS’s ability to recover costs for exhibits and demonstratives that were prepared but not ultimately used at trial. The trial court declined to reduce ASICS’s costs. The court of appeal affirmed. The California Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cantil-Sakauye, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
