Seguros del Estado v. Scientific Games
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
262 F.3d 1164 (2001)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Scientific Games, Inc. (Scientific) (defendant) contracted with Empresa Colombiana de Recursos Para la Salud, S.A. (Ecosalud), a Colombian government entity, to operate a lottery in Colombia. To ensure Scientific’s performance under the lottery contract, Scientific took out a performance bond issued by Seguros del Estado, S.A. (plaintiff). The bond agreement obligated Scientific to reimburse Seguros del Estado for any payments made under the bond. Ecosalud subsequently accused Scientific of breaching the lottery contract. Ecosalud issued an official declaration terminating the contract and assessed a $2.4 million penalty, which Seguros del Estado paid under the terms of its bond. A Colombian court denied Scientific’s petition to invalidate Ecosalud’s termination declaration. Scientific appealed that decision to a Colombian appellate court. While that appeal was still pending, Ecosalud filed suit to enforce its termination declaration in the United States. A federal district court granted Scientific’s lis alibi pendens motion to stay its proceedings pending the outcome of Scientific’s Colombian appeal. In the same federal district court, Seguros del Estado filed a separate suit for reimbursement of its penalty payment. Scientific filed a second lis alibi pendens motion to stay these proceedings as well. When the district court denied this second motion, Scientific appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, which had already affirmed the district court’s stay of the Ecosalud proceedings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.