Sentinel Acceptance Ltd., L.P. v. Hodson Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
45 S.W.3d 464 (2001)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Janet Hodson (defendant), a Missouri resident, was the president of Hodson Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc. (Hodson Auto) (defendant). Hodson's husband managed the day-to-day affairs of the company while she worked offsite. Sentinel Acceptance, Ltd. (Sentinel) (plaintiff) instituted arbitration proceedings against Hodson and Hodson Auto in California and secured an arbitral award of $16,052.11. Sentinel then filed the award with a California superior court, which entered a judgment confirming the arbitration award. Next, Sentinel registered the California judgment with a Missouri circuit court, seeking garnishment against Hodson and Hodson Auto to satisfy the judgment. Hodson claimed she was not personally served with any information about the arbitration and knew nothing about it. According to Hodson, her husband retained California counsel for her, who put in an appearance and responded to Sentinel's confirmation proceedings on her behalf, all without her knowledge. Hodson's California counsel confirmed that he had no contact with Hodson, only her husband. Hodson moved the Missouri circuit court to quash the registration of the California judgment on the basis of surprise, because she had no knowledge of the California proceedings against her. The trial judge quashed the registration, based on a Missouri rule providing that a foreign judgment registered in the state "is subject to the same procedures, defenses, and proceedings for reopening, vacating, or staying as a judgment of a circuit court" in Missouri. Sentinel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breckenridge, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.