Serafyn v. FCC

149 F.3d 1213 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Serafyn v. FCC

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
149 F.3d 1213 (1998)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

CBS filed an application for a new station license. Alexander Serafyn (plaintiff) petitioned the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) to deny the application or hold a hearing regarding the application on the ground that CBS was unfit to hold a broadcast license. Serafyn alleged that CBS had distorted news by airing a segment of 60 Minutes that claimed Ukrainians are anti-Semitic. To support his petition, Serafyn submitted the broadcast, which included quotes from interviewees who called Ukrainians uneducated peasants who were genetically anti-Semitic. Serafyn also submitted a dictionary showing that the Ukrainian word for Jew had been mistranslated into a slur, along with viewer letters and evidence that CBS had rejected an offer from a professor of Ukrainian history to help with the segment. The FCC did not hold a hearing regarding CBS’s application and eventually granted the application. Serafyn appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership