Shaheen v. Yonts

2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16020 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shaheen v. Yonts

United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16020 (2008)

Facts

Burgess Harrison Yonts (defendant) was a member of Lambda Chi Alpha fraternity at Murray State University who did not live at the fraternity house. Yonts attended a party at the fraternity house. Following the party, Yonts’s car struck Nadia Shaheen, causing her death. Joseph Shaheen (plaintiff), as administrator of Nadia’s estate, sued Yonts and other members of the fraternity (the other members) (defendants) who had hosted the party at the fraternity house. Among the claims brought by Joseph was a negligent-failure-to-control claim against the other members. Joseph argued that, as the hosts of the party, the other members had failed to control Yonts’s dangerous conduct of underage drinking and driving. Joseph submitted testimony of witnesses who observed Yonts consuming alcohol before the party and possessing alcohol at the party. Joseph also submitted testimony that Yonts had gone to his parked car during the party and argued that it was common for members who did not live at the fraternity house to bring their own beer and store the beer in their cars during the party. The other members moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Russell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership