Shajimon Joseph v. State of Kerala

W.P. (C) No. 16681 of 2006 (S), 2007 (1) KHC 1, 2006 KHC 275 : 2006 (1) KLT 919 : ILR 2006 (1) Ker. 705 : 2006 (1) KLJ 498 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shajimon Joseph v. State of Kerala

Kerala High Court
W.P. (C) No. 16681 of 2006 (S), 2007 (1) KHC 1, 2006 KHC 275 : 2006 (1) KLT 919 : ILR 2006 (1) Ker. 705 : 2006 (1) KLJ 498 (2006)

Facts

The residents of Alappuzha, a district of Kerala, did not have access to safe drinking water, a problem that had been ongoing for decades. In 2000, the Kerala Water Authority (the authority) (defendant) devised the Alappuzha Water Supply Scheme (the scheme) to provide clean drinking water. The authority conducted studies for two years before considering several potential sites for establishing a well. At one of the potential sites, the authority placed a foundation stone inscribed with the names of relevant political leaders. No further progress on the wells was made. Two residents, including Shajimon Joseph (plaintiff), filed a writ petition. Joseph asked the court to require the production of all information relating to the scheme and to require the authority to complete the scheme. The authority argued that it was unable to complete the project because the government refused to guarantee a loan. The State of Kerala (defendant) did not respond to the writ petition.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Siri Jagan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership