Shapiro v. United States
United States Supreme Court
335 U.S. 1 (1948)
Shapiro (defendant) was a wholesaler of fruit and produce. The Emergency Price Control Act required Shapiro to keep certain records that were subject to inspection by the Price Administrator (Administrator) (plaintiff). On September 29, 1944, the Administrator served Shapiro with a subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum requiring Shapiro to appear before the Office of Price Administration and produce sales records. Shapiro appeared and produced the records, but sought immunity from prosecution as to any information obtained from the records. Shapiro was convicted of violating the Act. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Vinson, C.J.)
Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.