Supreme Court of Rhode Island
710 A.2d 161 (1998)
Sheeley (plaintiff) gave birth at Memorial Hospital (defendant). During the birth, Dr. Ryder (defendant), a family practice resident, performed a procedure that later caused complications. Sheeley brought an action for medical malpractice. Rhode Island law limits expert testimony to someone who is qualified based on knowledge, skill, experience, training or education. At trial, the court excluded the testimony of Sheeley’s expert witness, Dr. Leslie, who would have testified as to the alleged malpractice and the applicable standard of care. The trial court relied on the fact that Dr. Leslie is a board certified obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN), and not a family practitioner, like Dr. Ryder. Without such expert testimony from the plaintiff, the trial court entered a directed verdict for the hospital and Dr. Ryder.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goldberg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.