Shin v. Superior Court

26 Cal. App. 4th 542 (1994)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 42,800+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shin v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

26 Cal. App. 4th 542 (1994)

Facts

Korea First Bank (KFB) (plaintiff) made a loan to Dong Suk Shin (defendant). In exchange, Shin issued KFB a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on real property located in California. Shin defaulted on the note. KFB brought an action in a Korean court seeking a ruling acknowledging that Shin was indebted to KFB under the note and allowing KFB to attach a prejudgment lien on Shin’s real property located in Korea. The Korean court granted the prejudgment lien, compromising Shin’s ability to liquidate the Korean real property. KFB then filed an action in California to foreclose on the real property located in California. Shin argued that KFB violated § 726 of the California Code of Civil Procedure by filing its action in the Korean court before filing its foreclosure action in California. The trial court granted KFB summary judgment on the issue, ruling that KFB had not violated § 726. Shin appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vogel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 684,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 684,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 42,800 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 684,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 42,800 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership