Shoafera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
228 F.3d 1070 (2000)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Nigist Shoafera entered the United States from Ethiopia in January 1990. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) began deportation proceedings, and Shoafera filed an application for asylum and withholding of deportation in February 1992. In proceedings before an immigration judge (IJ), Shoafera testified she feared persecution if she returned to Ethiopia on account of her Amharic ethnicity. Shoafera testified that she was beaten and raped by Belay, a man from the Tigrean ethnicity who held a position in her kebele, a government organization similar to a residential commune. Documentary evidence from a local hospital corroborated Shoafera’s testimony. Shoafera testified that she convinced her brother to report the assault and that the government arrested Belay but then released him after one month. Shoafera testified that, when Belay was released, she fled to another kebele because she learned Belay was looking for her. Shoafera and her sister testified that Belay raped Shoafera because of her Amharic ethnicity and because Belay felt empowered by his Tigrean ethnicity. Shoafera also testified she feared persecution if she returned to Ethiopia because Belay had gained significant political power, and she submitted other documentary evidence about the ethnic discord between Amharic and Tigrean groups. The IJ found Shoafera ineligible for asylum, finding that Shoafera had not established that Belay raped her on account of her Amharic ethnicity. Shoafera appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed the IJ decision. Shoafera appealed to the Tenth Circuit, renewing her asylum application.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.