Shubert Theatrical Company v. Rath
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
271 Fed. 827 (1921)
Shubert Theatrical Company (Shubert) (plaintiff) entered into a contract with Rath and other acrobats (defendants) for the defendants’ exclusive appearance in Shubert’s performances for one year in exchange for certain payments, with Shubert having an option for the defendants’ service for another year provided that Shubert give notice by July of the first year. Shubert employed the option, but the defendants refused to perform and instead contracted with a different company. Shubert sued to enjoin the defendants from performing for any company other than Shubert. The district court granted the injunction. The defendants appealed, arguing that the contract was inequitable because of its lack of mutuality and that specific performance was therefore unavailable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.