Shumate v. Twin Tier Hospitality, LLC

655 F. Supp. 2d 521 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shumate v. Twin Tier Hospitality, LLC

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
655 F. Supp. 2d 521 (2009)

Facts

Eric Davis, Natasha Shumate, and their child Naera (plaintiffs), who are all African American, tried to book a room at the Clarion Hotel (Clarion). However, the clerk, Lisa Pierce (defendant), told Davis that no rooms were available. Davis and his family alleged that Pierce refused to rent them a room and lied about the unavailability of rooms because of the color of Davis’s skin. Pierce said she didn’t have to explain anything to Davis and told him to get out of her hotel. Davis asked Pierce if she told him no rooms were available because he was black. Pierce replied, “Yes.” Davis and his family claimed that three white men were provided a room without hesitation. Natasha, Naera, and others in the lobby “witnessed, heard, and experienced” the exchange between Davis and Pierce. Twin Tier Hospitality, LLC (Twin Tier) (defendant) and Pierce filed a motion to dismiss the Davis family’s claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Munley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership