Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sierra Club v. Babbitt

69 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (1999)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Sierra Club v. Babbitt

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

69 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (1999)

Facts

In 1997, a storm caused damage to Yosemite National Park. The National Park Service (NPS) (defendant) sought to repair damage caused by the storm to the stretch of Highway 140 road known as El Portal Road from Yosemite National Park’s western border to the Pohono bridge. The Sierra Club (plaintiff) sought to enjoin the NPS from reconstructing the road until the NPS had undertaken the necessary consideration of all significant environmental effects in compliance with the National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (the Organic Act). The Sierra Club alleged that the NPS violated the Organic Act because the reconstruction of El Portal Road would permanently alter the Merced River Canyon in Yosemite National Park. The Sierra Club moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ishii, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership