Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,300+ case briefs...

Simovits v. Chanticleer Condo. Ass'n

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
933 F. Supp. 1394 (N.D. Ill. 1996)


The Simovits (plaintiffs) owned a condominium in a facility operated by Chanticleer Condominium Association (Chanticleer) (defendant). Chanticleer has a restrictive covenant that no minor children can reside in any unit, and no owner can sell a unit to anyone with children under the age of 18, without prior approval from Chanticleer. Many of Chanticleer’s residents are over the age of 55, but the facility is open to anyone over the age of 18. In 1995, the Simovits put their unit on the market for sale. Because of the restrictive covenant, the Simovits lost several potential buyers. Eventually, they sold their unit to a childless couple for a significantly lower price after Chanticleer agreed to waive the restrictive covenant. With the assistance of HOPE Fair Housing Center (plaintiff), a non-profit that promotes equal housing opportunities, the Simovits brought suit against Chanticleer, alleging that it had violated the Fair Housing Act’s prohibition on discriminating against families with children. The Simovits seek economic damages for the reduction in sale price and the additional mortgage payments they had to make due to the delay of the sale. They also claim they suffered emotional injury from Chanticleer’s actions. HOPE asks to be compensated for the time and money it spent in bringing this suit, and for funds to monitor Chanticleer’s future compliance with the Fair Housing Act. The plaintiffs additionally seek an award of punitive damages, and an injunction requiring Chanticleer to disregard family status of prospective residents for the next five years. After the suit was filed, Chanticleer conducted a survey attempting to verify the ages of its residents, but has guessed for several residents.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Keys, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 370,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,300 briefs, keyed to 223 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial