Simpson v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
989 F.Supp.2d 1015 (2013)
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. (CPK) (defendant) used partially hydrogenated vegetable oil (PHVO) in its frozen pizzas. Simpson (plaintiff) filed a class action suit against CPK, claiming that the use of PHVO constituted a public nuisance. Simpson claimed that PHVO was dangerous to consume because it could cause health problems. Simpson stated that in addition to the physical harm she incurred by consuming the frozen pizzas, she also suffered emotional harm after feeding the pizzas to her children. CPK filed a motion to dismiss.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sammartino, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.