Slaughter House Cases: Butchers’ Benevolent Assn. of New Orleans v. Crescent City Livestock Landing & Slaughter-house Co.
United States Supreme Court
83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L. Ed. 394 (1873)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
The City of New Orleans faced severe outbreaks of disease after its water supply was contaminated with the refuse from slaughterhouses located about a mile upstream on the Mississippi River. The Louisiana state legislature sought to remedy this problem by centralizing the location of all slaughtering away from the water supply. It did this by creating the Crescent City Livestock Landing & Slaughter-house Co. (defendant) and gave the company a monopoly over the entire slaughtering business in and around New Orleans. The legislature required all butchers to rent out space from the company and conduct all butchering activities on the premises. The Butchers’ Benevolent Association of New Orleans (plaintiff) brought several suits against the company alleging that the Louisiana law was an unconstitutional violation of the servitude prohibition in the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Privileges and Immunities Clause, Due Process Clause, and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The case was submitted on writ of error to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which held for the company. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)
Dissent (Swayne, J.)
Dissent (Field, J.)
Dissent (Bradley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
