Sloan & Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
653 F.3d 175 (2011)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Shoemaker was a contractor on a project for Isla of Capri Associates LP (IOC). Sloan & Company (Sloan) (plaintiff) was a subcontractor on the project. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) (defendant) insured payment for the subcontractors’ work. Under the terms of Sloan’s subcontract, IOC’s final payment to Shoemaker was a condition precedent to Shoemaker’s payment to Sloan. The subcontract also provided that, if Sloan had not received payment within six months of when payment from IOC to Shoemaker was due, Sloan could pursue a claim against Shoemaker and Liberty Mutual for payment. When the project was finished, IOC refused to pay Shoemaker, and Shoemaker then refused to pay Sloan. Sloan sued Liberty Mutual for payment. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Sloan, and Liberty Mutual appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ambro, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.