Slover v. Industrial Commission

702 N.E.2d 664 (1998)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Slover v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Appellate Court
702 N.E.2d 664 (1998)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Dixie Slover (plaintiff) filed a claim for workers’ compensation due to injuries arising out of her employment with Xenia (defendant). Slover and Xenia entered into a settlement contract that obligated Xenia to pay Slover’s medical bills. Subsequently, Slover filed a petition in circuit court pursuant to § 19(g) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (the act), alleging that Xenia had failed to pay all of Slover’s medical bills. Slover filed the settlement contract with the circuit court. The filed settlement contract bore a stamp that stated, “Approved and Certified pursuant to 48 IL Rev. Stat. 138.14,” and the stamp included signatures of the members of the Industrial Commission and the arbitrator. The filed contract was not signed by the secretary or assistant secretary of the Industrial Commission. Xenia filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction due to Slover’s failure to file a certified copy of the settlement contract. The circuit court agreed and granted Xenia’s motion. Slover appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCullough, J.)

Dissent (Rarick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership