Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315

441 U.S. 463, 99 S. Ct. 1826, 60 L. Ed. 2d 360 (1979)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,100+ case briefs...

Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315

United States Supreme Court

441 U.S. 463, 99 S. Ct. 1826, 60 L. Ed. 2d 360 (1979)

Facts

Arkansas State Highway Employees (the union) (plaintiffs), a union representing employees of the State Highway Commission (the commission) (defendant), initiated grievance proceedings against the commission. However, the commission, per its own policy, would only hear grievances submitted in written form by individual employees submitted to the designated employer representative. The union sued, contending that such a procedural requirement denied employees the opportunity to submit grievances in violation of the First Amendment. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas agreed with the union. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,100 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership