Smith v. Bob Smith Chevrolet, Inc.

275 F. Supp. 2d 808 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Smith v. Bob Smith Chevrolet, Inc.

United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
275 F. Supp. 2d 808 (2003)

SC

Facts

Christopher Smith (plaintiff) agreed to buy a car from Bob Smith Chevrolet, Inc. (the dealership) (defendant) and trade in his old car. Smith had not fully paid off his old car, and this was taken into account in the final price to be paid for the new car. Once the parties agreed to a price, Smith bought the car. The dealership soon discovered that a dealership employee inadvertently had twice entered the discount to which Smith was entitled. The dealership thus sought additional payment from Smith and withheld the title to the car. At this point, the dealership accessed Smith’s credit report. Smith sued the dealership for breach of the sales contract and won in state court. Smith also sued the dealership in federal court for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) when it accessed his credit report. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The dealership argued that it accessed the credit report for a legitimate business need related to the transaction that Smith originated. The dealership also argued that the transaction involved collection of an account from Smith, given that the dealership claimed Smith still owed money for the car.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heyburn, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership