Smith v. DeParry
Florida District Court of Appeal
86 So. 3d 1228 (2012)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Scott Smith executed a will and a codicil to create a pet trust for his two dogs. The will named Thomas Allen, who was Smith’s longtime attorney, and Lance Smith as co-personal representatives, who also signed as witnesses. The codicil established a $40,000 trust fund for Lance to care for the two dogs. Allen lost and never found the original codicil, but he printed a copy from his computer. The representatives submitted the will and the unsigned copy of the codicil to probate, naming the guardian of Scott’s minor grandson, Astrid DeParry, as an interested party. The probate court found the computer copy did not qualify as a correct copy, and that neither co-personal representative qualified as a disinterested witness who could prove up the lost codicil. Therefore, the trust failed. Allen and Lance appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wallace, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
