Smith v. Doe
United States Supreme Court
538 U.S. 84 (2003)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
The Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act required mandatory registration of sex offenders and community notification. John Doe I and John Doe II (defendants), who had previously been convicted for sexually abusing a minor, were required to register as sex offenders. John Doe I, his wife, and John Doe II sought a declaratory judgment that the statute was void as to John Doe I and John Doe II because it was a retroactive punishment prohibited by the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. The United States District Court for the District of Alaska ruled against John Doe I and John Doe II. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. Certiorari was granted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.