Sogeti v. Scariano

606 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (2009)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sogeti v. Scariano

United States District Court for the District of Arizona
606 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (2009)

SC

Facts

Christian Martinez (defendant) worked for Software Architects, Inc. (SARK). Martinez signed an employment contract that included a noncompetition clause. The agreement did not contain any language regarding its assignability. Sogeti USA LLC (Sogeti) (plaintiff) acquired SARK. After this acquisition, Martinez terminated his employment and went to work for Neudesic, LLC (defendant). Sogeti brought suit, asserting that Martinez violated the noncompetition agreement by going to work for Neudesic. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that Sogeti could not enforce the noncompetition agreement, because Sogeti was not a party to the agreement and the agreement was not validly assigned to it.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Silver, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms